Logoi: The Limited Logos.
"Logic is Spirit working upon the world."--Hegel
(∃x)[Lx * (Sx * Wx)][1]
I will call λόγοι (logoi) or
the plural of λόγος (logos) the limited logos since it is through
language--a symbolic universe, or simulacrum--that we connect to being. Heidegger doesn’t
always make clear what sense of Logos is being used in a discussion. Our tool
of investigation is philosophy, “For philosophy...the object is not
present; what is more, philosophy has no object to begin with. It is a process which must at all times achieve being (in its appropriate manifestness) anew”(Introduction to Metaphysics, Heidegger, p.71;referred to as “IM” here on). Philosophy is a permanent critique--a rebellion against appearance at first-- asking the question of Being.
Being is undefined and ambiguous, but “the
determinateness with which we understand the indeterminate meaning can be
unambiguously delimited, and not after the fact, but as a determinateness
which, unbeknownst to us, governs us from out of our very foundations” (IM, p.71). Being reveals itself as un-concealment and appearance in which we also
find the possibility of deception, illusion, and error. I will use the Greek
word λόγοι (logoi) , or the plural of λόγος (logos), meaning the limiting
of λόγος (logos). The term “logoi” used in this way cannot be found in
Heidegger’s writing, but it can assist understanding what he means by the
“limited logos.” This is still λόγος understood as a governing paradigm, but
rationality as a specific form of logoi that is a cultural pattern, the
cultural stock of knowledge, epistemological categorical typifications, ranges
of logical possibilities, and reified meanings for interpreting the world for
objective content.
Heidegger uses the term logos in two ways:
Logos as Being, and as Human Logos, or limited Logos as
the humans in Antigone’s poem (lines 368-416). Human beings can
apprehend being but in apprehension νοέω (noein “thinking by the subject of the
object") and τέχνη (techne) “a knowledge, the ability to plan and
organize freely, to master institutions...” does δίκη, (law/order) to φύσις (nature), which is “the realm of being
as a whole.” The violence is by thought dividing the whole of being
into many parts. “But in thinking we not only place something before
ourselves, we not only dismember it for the sake of dismembering, but,
reflecting, we pursue the thing represented"(IM, p.100).
The logoi are the interpretive concepts of the excluded, included, valid, invalid, logical, irrational, scripts, frames, truth, falsity, requirements, prohibitions, rules, algorithms, violations, objects, entities, conditions, situations, states, non-states, relations, meaning, meaninglessness, usage, mistakes, expressions, kinships, social arrangement, institutions, history, knowledge, sense, nonsense, context, boundaries, parameters, appearance, real, illusion, reification, and the symbolic.
The logoi is a systematic
attempt by thought to make sense of human existence in the world. Culture is
logocentric (forming around cultural symbols of meaning). This systemization of
experience is expressed as symbolization of life to embody the world, and our
apprehension of the world. Symbolization is a strategy for living in a world
because it relates everything into a larger context—a cultural context to
provide meaning. Symbolization is powerful and over time the whole of life
becomes dissected into unrelated moments in experience and the possibility of
new experiences is blunted. Life is no longer lived in the moment, but in
disconnect paradigmatic micro-worlds. Experience is delimited and censored by uncritical
predetermined cultural concepts and notions. When Life and the world of
cultural symbols diverge, society loses its power to give meaning to
experience. Life becomes ἄλογος, not rational, or irrational.
Heidegger accepts Husserl’s view that all
appearance is intentional and from this intentionality all objectivity is given
pre-shaped meaning. This creates an ontological (ontos) structuring to the world of entities, or essents, “a
fundamental characteristic of the essent is to τέλος which means not aim, or purpose, but end...End
is ending in the sense of fulfillment. Limit and end are that wherewith the
essent begins to be”(IM, p.50).
All forms of human logoi are
distortions of being that give meaning to life. They embody meaning shared by
members in a culture and are intersubjective—shared by all as the meaning, or
definition of reality. It is an intersubjective reality. Intersubjectivity is
characteristic of intentionality.
Heidegger is saying that reducing meaningful thinking to logic has damaged our understanding between being and thought, “Logic relieves us of the need for any troublesome inquiry into the essence of thinking” (IM, p.101). The question of being is τὰ μετὰ τὰ φυσικά: "after"(meta) the φύσις, or "physics" (Nature)--or meta-physics. For Heidegger logic is metaphysics and is itself an object for examination. Heidegger agrees with Wittgenstein about logic and intellectualism (what we have called scientism rooted in logical positivism). Logic arises with the division between being and thought:“To surpass the traditional logic does not mean elimination of thought and the domination of sheer feeling; it means more radical, stricter thinking, a thinking that is part and parcel of being”(IM,p.103).
Heidegger’s call is for authentic thinking that goes beyond mere appearance and entities, “If one is to ask the question of being radically, one must understand the task of unfolding the truth of the essence of being; one must come to a decision regarding the powers hidden in these distinctions in order to restore them to their own truth”(IM, p. 50). Some are αχγηετοι,uncomprehending, but the logoi is intersubjective so there is correspondence and mediation between Humans and Being (Logos).
[1] Here are the definitions of symbols for the categorical proposition:
(∃x) = "there exists one x."
* = and
x = constant
L = logic
S = Spirit
W = "working on the world."
Collections of
Heidegger’s works in English Translation:
Basic Writings, Edited by David Farrell Krell. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.
Contains the Introduction to Being and Time and nine key essays: “What is Metaphysics?,” “On the Essence of Truth,” “The Origin of the Work of Art,” “Letter on Humanism,” “Modern Science, Metaphysics, and Mathematics,” “The Question Concerning Technology,” “Building Dwelling Thinking,” “What Calls for Thinking?,” and “The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking.”
Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
Contains “The Thinker as Poet” (a few of Heidegger’s attempts at poetry), and the essays “The Origin of the Work of Art,” “What are Poets For?,” “Building Dwelling Thinking,” “The Thing,” “Language,” and “. . . Poetically Man Dwells . . .”
The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.
Basic Writings, Edited by David Farrell Krell. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.
Contains the Introduction to Being and Time and nine key essays: “What is Metaphysics?,” “On the Essence of Truth,” “The Origin of the Work of Art,” “Letter on Humanism,” “Modern Science, Metaphysics, and Mathematics,” “The Question Concerning Technology,” “Building Dwelling Thinking,” “What Calls for Thinking?,” and “The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking.”
Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
Contains “The Thinker as Poet” (a few of Heidegger’s attempts at poetry), and the essays “The Origin of the Work of Art,” “What are Poets For?,” “Building Dwelling Thinking,” “The Thing,” “Language,” and “. . . Poetically Man Dwells . . .”
The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.
Contains “The
Question Concerning Technology,” “The Turning,” “The Word of Nietzsche: ‘God is
Dead,’” “The Age of the World Picture,” and “Science and Reflection.”
No comments:
Post a Comment