A Theory of Spiritual Experience:
A Synthesis of Symbolic Logic and Mysticism of the Ordinary
“Greek Chorus Sings...There is much that is strange, but nothing that surpasses man in strangeness.”
"The honest religious thinker is like a tightrope walker. It almost looks as though he were walking on nothing but air. His support is the slenderest imaginable. And yet it really is possible to walk on it."
--Ludwig Wittgenstein (Culture and Value,1998, p. 84).
My blogger name is “κύκλος” [pronounced; Key-close] which is a Greek word for "ring" or “cycle” as in the cycle of government forms--Aristocracy, Monarchy, Democracy,
Tyranny--that Socrates explains in his dialogue, “Republic.” Or in my case,
the cycle of writing, reflecting, rewriting, rethinking the question of
spiritual experience.
This blog page will continue my philosophical studies from
my late 1970’s master thesis on a theory of spiritual experience. Since that
time, I collected notes, wrote essays, and rewrote them again last year, and
now yet again. Each version has sharper focus and is more directly to the
point. Although the master thesis focused on Thomas Kuhn’s concept of
scientific paradigms, my search was really for a theory of spiritual
experience. What is the logical status of theological propositions in
relationship to scientific empiricist propositions, meta-logical propositions
of symbolic logic, and ethical prescriptions?
I want to write in plain simple English and not assume the
reader has extensive knowledge of philosophy. My purpose is to stimulate
interest and save the reader time exploring this subject. Ernest Hemingway
wrote the novel “The Old Man and the Sea” using the Iceberg Theory of writing
that is a minimalist style. What if philosophy could be written as clearly, and
simply as Old Man and the Sea? A thesis should be minimalist with
airtight logic so that counter-arguments have no surface imperfections to hang
on and slide off. This minimalism will require clear thinking with clear
writing so one cannot hide behind complex technical terminology; although, fine
definitions are critical for understanding philosophical problems. Yet, the
greatest power of language is its ambiguity.
This discussion will draw from thinkers such as Edmond
Husserl, Martin Heidegger, Pre-Socratic philosophers, Theologian Immanuel Kant,
Theodore Adorno, Theologian Paul Tillich, Logician Ludwig Wittgenstein,
Theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher, and Sociologist Karl Mannheim. Many of the
books authored by these philosophers are non-copyrighted with free, or archived pdf copies to borrow by other sites: I will link to them if available.
Critical Theorist Theodore W. Adorno writes about the telos of
philosophy and I want to quote it at length since I have spent, in one way or
another, studying this one passage for over ten years. I’ll never finish the
book. This web page is a constellation of essays in exploring this search to say the unsayable:
--Kyklos
“The truth of art lies in its power to break the monopoly of established reality to define what is real.” --Herbert Marcuse.
"This experience that there is something we want to say...but which cannot be said ...is what philosophy as negative dialectic strives continually to reproduce."--Adorno:The Recovery of Experience (Roger Foster)
No comments:
Post a Comment