Thursday, June 20, 2019

The Telos of Absolute Idealism


…in the Absolute, all is one,”—Friedrich Schelling

“…in the Absolute, all cows are black…”—Hegel’s critique of Schelling


The Greek concept of Telos (τέλος) is introduced in episode 2 of Dr. Vervaeke’s lecture series on cognition along with the concept of “patterns” in meaning, meaning making, and cognition. His lectures have greatly enhanced my understanding of the theologian Wilhelm Hegel’s absolute idealism and appreciation of this discipline known as cognitive science. In a way, this topic leads back to theologian Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834) a contemporary of Hegel (1770-1831) who was also a theologian. Telos means “fulfillment,” “end,” “result” or even can mean a charged “tax,” or “toll.” A person on a journey, or climbing to a mountaintop has a telos, goal, or purpose. Historical time can be viewed as cyclical, or linear. Time thought to be circular is a closed system. The Ancient Greeks viewed historical time as circular with persons having predetermined fates. A linear upward climb of time to a goal or completion is teleological and open ended to multiple possibilities. For the Ancient Greeks the ancient past is perfect and as time moves into the future the cosmos becomes imperfect. On the other hand, a progressive telos of history is thought to be moving upward and onward to reach a higher level of actualized being (Aristotle). But exactly what is history moving toward?

“For Hegel, the inner movement of reality is the process of God thinking as manifested in the evolution of the universe of nature and thought; that is, Hegel argued that, when fully and properly understood, reality is being thought by God as manifested in man's comprehension of this process in and through philosophy”(Wiki: Hegel).

You should not have skipped that philosophy course in college! The theological view of Hegelian absolute idealism is a little more intelligible only because we are familiar with Christian theism so this interpretation is actually very helpful in understanding what Hegel means by reality, mind, phenomenon, historical process, and knowledge. The German word for mind, “Geist” is also the same word as for “spirit.” Mind in this context has the meaning of “distinct from the body.” Spirit can mean “spirit of the times,” as in Zeitgeist, or spirit can mean “The Holy Spirit” as in “der Heilige Geist.” Absolute knowledge is a key concept for Hegel. Absolute knowledge does not mean knowing everything which is clearly humanly impossible, but rather knowledge of reality, as what is, and not as the world appears. Hegel shows in his work “Phenomenology of Spirit” (1807) (referred to as PS) how this knowledge is possible and it is not merely a matter of collecting more empirical data, which is the job of science. Hegel’s scientific philosophy is a history of cognition on the path of experience.

Hegel viewed his task as documenting the historical journey of human thought--of mind, of consciousness in the highest abstract sense--educating itself as it struggles with material existence and itself. Consciousness changes into different shapes or forms, “as series of configurations,” as it reaches a higher understanding of itself on the torturous historical road of experience—to Calvary. Adorno referred to this historical process as the “suffering of the concept.” Hegel’s abstract idealism is integrated with world history for this is how mind becomes appearance, a phenomenon. Thought comes to know itself as self-consciousness and understands that reality is ultimately mind creating a purposive collective social community with coercive force that can build or destroy. Absolute knowledge is reached when thought realizes through this experience of consciousness that it seeks to know itself. Self-consciousness is consciousness reflecting on itself. History is the teleological manifestation of a pattern, the incarnation, and appearance (phenomenon) of mind in human historical experience.

The force that moves history forward is the logical impulse of mind itself to resolve all division, disunity, and contradiction in thought and existence.  In Hegelian philosophy the category of “Contradiction” is not just a rule of formal logic (p and ~p) rather “contradiction” mirrors a part of the ontological structure of Being—not merely a methodological tool to investigate the world. Contradictions can be forensically, or critically investigated to determine what ideas brought together opposing theses. We see this all the time in Marx’s critique of political economy.

“But the goal is as necessarily fixed for knowledge as the serial progression; it is the point where knowledge no longer needs to go beyond itself, where knowledge finds itself, where Notion corresponds to object and object to Notion. Hence the progress towards this goal is unhalting….” (Phenomenology of Spirit, Intro., para. 80).

Hegel is an absolute idealist, not a relative idealist that believes there are many interpretations of many different realities and like a solipsist thinks only their own experiences and thoughts are real with no objective reality by which to judge any one worldview over another. Absolute idealists believe in one reality because there is only one mind. The Absolute is an indefinite One: not a definite substance, or a cow--only immaterial mind.

“Dealing with something from the perspective of the Absolute consist merely in declaring that …as something definite, yet in the Absolute, A=A, there is nothing of the kind, for all is one…[In this incorrect view of the Absolute]… all cows are black.” —Hegel’s critique of Schelling’s concept of the Absolute, “The Phenomenology of Spirit (1807)” English trans. by J. Baillie, London,1909, Preface, paragraph 16.

Reducing the Absolute (Reality) to a substance, or thing is a common tendency in Western thought. Ambiguously, Hegel has an Eastern concept of the Absolute. However, we find that for Hegel human “history is nothing but the progress of consciousness of freedom”(Hegel: A Very Short Introduction, Peter Singer, 1983, Oxford Univ. Press, p. 33). Once again, mind has stepped into the Agora, ἀγορά (or “marketplace,” related to the word “agriculture”) just as Socrates asked in the agora, “What is virtue?” The cynical and Cynic philosopher Diogenes searched for an honest man in the marketplace-it’s funny when you really think about it. And again the Christian monk Martin Luther “protested” (being a “protest-tant)” in the agora against the lifeless corpse of an authoritarian Christianity by declaring that human beings have their own spiritual nature and do not need permission to interpret the Scriptures from any external authority!

In Hegel’s philosophical work “Philosophy of History” (1837) freedom does not mean to do as one wishes (Ethical Wantism), but having a free mind since we are not free if others coerce us by physical force or lies. We are not free when controlled by personal desire instead of Reason (Vernunft). Freedom only comes from free rational choice. Reason is universal and reality is the self-manifestation of the Logos. Hegel rejects the Kantian block and believes the noumenal world, or the thing-in-itself, is not beyond thought but can be known. Hegel said of this empirical manifestation “the rational is real, and the real is rational.” Logos is a characteristic of mind so that it is also universal. All human beings are linked by universal Reason. The greatest obstacle to a free society is that individual persons do not know they are a part of this universal mind. Consciousness through experience begins to slowly understand itself as both universal and rational. In the Phenomenology of Spirit Hegel travels down the road to Absolute knowledge describing how consciousness finally comprehends the close connection between freedom and knowledge. “Spirit is indeed never at rest but always engaged in moving forward” (PS, para. 11). Mind is necessarily communal in which persons can purposively participate in a rationally organized way:

“…Hegel insists that knowledge is only knowledge if it can be communicated…The necessity of language rules out the idea of a entirely independent consciousness. Consciousness must interact with other consciousness if it is to develop self-consciousness. In the end, mind can only find freedom and self-understanding in a rationally organized community. So minds are not separate atoms, linked together by the accidents of associations. Individual minds exist together, or they do not exist at all” (Singer, p. 96). 


"...the true is the whole."-Hegel

In “Phenomenology of Spirit” the Preface is titled, “On Scientific Cognition” so Hegel understood his historical review of Western philosophy as showing the different shapes of mind: “The series of configurations which consciousness goes through along this road is, in reality the detailed history of the education of consciousness itself to the standpoint of Science” (PS, para. 78). Science during Hegel’s time meant “systematic inquiry.” Hegel examines each stage of mind in detail like a jeweler studying every light-reflecting facet of a finely cut diamond in an attempt to say the unsayable. It is this topic that Hegel mostly earns the reputation of an obscure writer; however, his train of thought can still be followed. Much of what Hegel’s critics call incomprehensible is Christian theology. This phenomenological history is structured to show the triadic stages of consciousness: Consciousness (Bewusstsein), Self-Consciousness (Selbstbewusstsein), and Reason (Vernunft).

Sense-certainty


The first undeveloped form of consciousness appears as the problem of knowledge and certainty.  Hegel described this consciousness in the first part of Phenomenology of Spirit as Sense-certainty that only relies on sense perception of a particular object of knowledge. Sense certainty is the uncritical natural naïve attitude toward objects, but views itself as having genuine practical knowledge of the world.  Sense-certainty only receives sense data at the here and now of this or that.” This type of knowledge really isn’t knowledge at all for it does not categorize the particular, but only records sense perception in the now. This is the most primitive empiricism that cannot coherently state any truth about experience since it lacks universal concepts to classify objects in some order. Knowledge cannot only be of the particular sense experience for they need concepts. However, the very general terms of language “here,” “now,” “that” themselves are universal concepts that point the way to the next higher stage of consciousness.

Perception and Understanding


Perception and Understanding (Verstand) are the next forms of consciousness to go beyond the particulars to the universals of language so that unity and coherence is given to the stream of raw sense data received in sense experience. A model of perceptual experience must be created to organize sense perception. And yet perception still lacks the power to understand reality so consciousness constructs its own laws of physics (Gravity, Electromagnetism, Force) to achieve order and unity of experience. Consciousness as understanding, or intelligibility mistakes these paradigmatic constructs as real objects (reification) so that consciousness is now really trying to understand itself. Consciousness in trying to understand itself is now latent self-consciousness.

Self-Consciousness: Stoicism, Skepticism, and Unhappy Consciousness

In discussing how latent self-consciousness becomes self-consciousness, Hegel switches away from epistemology to Life as conflict. Living self-consciousness desires (Begierde) to establish its own identity as a person, so self-consciousness must have an opposing object to differentiate itself, or a non-self. Consciousness’ sense of selfhood needs another self to create its identity-in-difference. Self-consciousness needs an external object to define itself, yet it views all externality as a threat. To achieve recognition self-consciousness needs another object to possess, but when the object is made its own the object’s externality is negated so self-consciousness is alone once again. Self-consciousness must have another object without destroying its otherness so it seeks to possess another person--another self-consciousness, or we-consciousness. This struggle with another consciousness forms a Master/Slave relationship in which one seeks to destroy the other. However, in this power struggle the Master realizes he still needs the other self-consciousness and spares the other to spare his own self. This historical situation causes a variety of internal divisions in consciousness that reappears in other stages of cognition. The master only perceives himself as a true person. The slave (Servile Consciousness) projects his selfhood onto the master, but while in this dialectical relationship the slave transforms material existence by his labor opening the way to the next emerging stage of higher self-consciousness.

“To be free is not to be either master or slave, not to discover oneself in this or that situation in the midst of life: it is to behave as a thinking being in all circumstances.”-Jean Hyppolite (“Genesis and Structure of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit,” Northwestern University, 1974, p.180)(pdf.).

Consciousness takes the form of Stoicism that teaches both master and slave to withdraw from the world into consciousness where “I = I” in an escape into a false liberty existing only in abstract thought. Hegel writes of Stoicism, “The essence of consciousness is to be free, on the throne or in chains….” Stoicism is not just a single isolated philosophy for the citizens of the Roman Empire, but a universal philosophy that every self-consciousness goes through in a teleological development of mind. Since the differences between life and the self remain unchanged, Stoic withdrawing into subjective interiority disconnects the person from the external world making it impossible to actualize itself into a stable human being.

Skepticism is the next stage of consciousness as a self-contradictory philosophical attitude toward life; however, this is not the skepticism of Hume. Historian of philosophy Frederick Copleston said of this transition from Stoicism to Skepticism,“…this negative attitude towards the concrete and external passes easily into the Skeptical consciousness for which the self alone abides while all else is subject to doubt and negation” A History of Philosophy: Modern Philosophy, Fichte to Hegel, Vol. 7, Part I, Doubleday, 1965, p. 223).

The unhappy consciousness is the “alienated soul” reflecting the division of existence into materiality and transcendent spirituality. This internal disunion is reflected in consciousness as physical desire (flesh) working against spiritual fidelity (faith). Hegel viewed this form of Christianity as consciousness projecting onto a transcendental deity all human qualities of personhood missing in the finite material world of suffering. The unhappy consciousness is aware of this internal split that appears similar to the master/slave struggle, but now disunity is between man and G-d. “…the self is conscious of the gulf between a changing, inconsistent, fickle self and a changeless, ideal self…this ideal self can be projected into an other-worldly sphere and identified with absolute perfection, God considered as existing apart from the world and the finite self. 21 The human consciousness is divided, self-alienated, ‘unhappy’.” (Ibid., p. 223). Again, this cleft consciousness is not the living spirit of a unified life. For Hegel, Christianity is just one modality of the unhappy consciousness inherited from Judaism.

From this point in the Phenomenology of Spirit, Hegel continues on to the telos of Absolute knowledge, Reason, and Freedom.

Of course Kierkegaard would disagree with all of this Hegelian systematization. As much as he railed against Hegel's dialectical system, Kierkegaard incorporates dialectical "contradiction" in his description of the stages of human existence, but going in the opposite direction! In contradiction to Hegel, Kierkegaard wrote “Concluding Unscientific Postscript”(1846) as an anti-Hegelian dialectic which moves not toward universal world-history, but the subjective individual existent; not to Absolute knowledge, but to uncertainty and faith; not theoretical integration, but fragmentary disintegration of truth. The Real is the absurd. Human spirituality cannot just be another object of science. Human existence is "Unscientific," or dynamically ongoing and fragmentary. Human existence can only be a  "Postscript," or an unsystematic remainder of any comprehensive philosophical system.

That was grueling. I need Space Lady...



Synthesize Me

Your eyes are set on stun
You are hotter than the sun
I love to see you shine
Because you really blow my mind

Your heart beats like a drum
It hammers when you're gone
The terms with you and me are up, set us free

Synthesize Me
Hypnotize Me
Humanize Me
Energize Me 

Your eyes are set on stun
You are hotter than the sun
I love to see you shine
Because you really blow my mind

Your heart beats like a drum
It hammers when you're gone
The terms with you and me are up, set us free

Synthesize Me
Hypnotize Me
Humanize Me
Energize Me 

I've seen the rings of Saturn
And the craters on the Moon
Oceans of Venus in the middle of June
Mirrors of Mercury and Mars' electric skies
Pearls of Neptune in Jupiter's eyes
I heard the old man who plays the lake
Amazing things will make you want to shake
A strange planet a zillion lightyears away
Through a black hole across the milky way

Synthesize Me
Hypnotize Me
Humanize Me
Energize Me 

Don't patronize me
Don't glamorize me
Don't paralyze me
You can't surprise me

Harmonize me
Mesmerize me
Solarize me
Synchronise me
Synthesize me


No comments:

Post a Comment